Legal Opinion
Morristown Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Lotspeich Publishing Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided August 10, 1956PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff agrees that the statement of the case and the pleadings are correctly stated in the defendant’s brief, as follows:
“Plaintiff, Morristown Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., filed suit in the Circuit Court for Knox County, Tennessee, on September 17, 1954, seeking damages against the defendant, based upon an alleged breach of contract. Plaintiff alleged that the parties had entered into a written agreement whereby the defendant contracted to publish certain advertising relating to the sale of new and used Lincoln and Mercury…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Black v. Love & Amos Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Bradford & Carson v. Montgomery Furniture Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Conaway v. New York Life Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Supreme Liberty L. Ins. Co. v. PemeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Grantham and Mann, Inc., D/B/A Grantham Safety Industries, Inc. v. American Safety Products, Inc., Sam Evans, Richard J. Althoff and James HunnekeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Ford Motor Company v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Lamons v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Ferreira v. Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- Lance Productions, Inc. v. Commerce Union BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.