Bradford & Carson v. Montgomery Furniture Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —John Allison, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields
delivered, the opinion of the Court.
Compiaintants J. H. Bradford and J. T. Carson, partners under the firm name and style of Bradford & Carson, bring this bill against R. J., B. W. and W. W. Montgomery, partners under the firm name and style of Montgomery Furniture Co., to recover upon a note made to complainants by the defendants on February 2, 1902, for $3,000.
The defense made by answer and cross bill, is that the complainants have breached a contract and agreement made with the defendants in part consideration of the note sued on, and have thus destroyed the consideration of the note and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Warfield v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Dunlop v. . GregoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Mitchell v. . ReadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Agricultural Services Association, Incorporated v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Incorporated, and Waldo Rohnert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.