Legal Opinion

Arvin v. McClintock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1961No. 464PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winboene, C. J.:

The sole question to be decided in case on appeal is whether or not the trial court erred in allowing defendants’ motion for nonsuit. Taking the evidence offered upon the trial in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and giving to him the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, as is done when considering motion for judgment of nonsuit, the conclusion is that the plaintiff’s intestate was negligent, as a matter of law, and that his negligence contributed to his untimely death, Clontz v. Krimminger,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Price v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Presnell v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Carter v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Peeler v. CruseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API