Jacobson v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Plaintiffs have a house by the side of the road. Defendant operates logging trucks on that road. Plaintiffs contend the vibrations from defendant’s trucks are damaging their house and seek recovery. They secured a jury verdict, but defendant was granted a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. Plaintiffs appeal.
After a verdict for plaintiffs, we state the facts in accordance with the evidence most favorable to them. A county road runs very close to plaintiffs’ house. The evidence does not indicate the exact distance between the two points, but defendant, in its brief, states it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Furrer v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Raymond v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- West v. National Mines Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Ainsworth v. OwenbyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.