Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiffs have a house by the side of the road. Defendant operates logging trucks on that road. Plaintiffs contend the vibrations from defendant’s trucks are damaging their house and seek recovery. They secured a jury verdict, but defendant was granted a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial. Plaintiffs appeal.

After a verdict for plaintiffs, we state the facts in accordance with the evidence most favorable to them. A county road runs very close to plaintiffs’ house. The evidence does not indicate the exact distance between the two points, but defendant, in its brief, states it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Raymond v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. West v. National Mines Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Ainsworth v. OwenbyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API