Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Southern Pacific Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1971PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAX j.

This is an action for wrongful death brought by decedent’s husband as administrator for his personal benefit. Plaintiff appealed from a judgment for defendant entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

Decedem was lulled while riding as a passenger in a vehicle driven by plaintiff at the time a collision occurred with one of defendant’s trains. Plaintiff’s cause of action was alleged in two counts. One purported to te based on nuisance and the other on negligence. Defendant filed a demurrer to the nuisance count. The demurrer was sustained and the case was tried on tie negligence theory.

1.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McLane v. Northwest Natural Gas CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Prauss v. AdamskiOregon Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. MacCa v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Meyer v. 4-D Insulation Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API