Belin v. Dingle
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*72MURPHY, Chief Judge.
According to the Judicial Council of the American Medical Association,
To have another physician operate on one’s patient without the patient’s knowledge and consent is a deceit. The patient is entitled to choose his own physician and should be permitted to acquiesce in or refuse to accept the substitution. The surgeon’s obligation to the patient requires him to perform the surgical operation: (1) within the scope of authority granted by the consent to the operation; (2) in accordance with the terms of the contractual relationship; (3) with complete disclosure of all facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perna v. PirozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Levett v. EtkindSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Dover Elevator Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Kennelly v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gohari v. DarvishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Dingle v. BelinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Belin v. DingleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999