Legal Opinion

Perna v. Pirozzi

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1983PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

This appeal challenges the validity of R. 4:21, which requires the pre-trial submission of medical malpractice claims to a panel consisting of a judge, an attorney and a physician. More specifically, the appeal questions whether a plaintiff may cross-examine a defendant-doctor about alleged prior inconsistent statements at a panel hearing and whether the trial court may refuse to permit a plaintiff to show possible bias of the panel-doctor in favor of the defendant-doctor. With respect to the latter issue, plaintiffs did not object to the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. DiCarlo v. St. Mary HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Leang v. Jersey City Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API