Legal Opinion

J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & Lay

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1918No. 7 Div. 497PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; John H. Disque, Judge. Action' by J. H. Arnold & Co. against Pinckard & Lay. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrioken, J.

This case is submitted on motion to strike the bill of exceptions; the several grounds of said motion being predicated upon a noncomplianee with rule 32 of circuit court practice (Code 1907, p. 1526).

Prom an’ examination of the paper designated as the hill of exceptions, it appears that the motion is well taken, and that the so-called bill of exceptions is manifestly a flagrant violation of said rule, in that it appears to he a full stenographic report of the trial below, containing, as it does, a statement of everything that was done on the trial, and sets forth practically every word…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. Turner v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Gassenheimer Paper Co. v. Marietta Paper Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Hester v. CantrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Lucas v. MaysAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Windham v. City of AndalusiaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Brooks v. Downing-Shofner SchoolAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Ex Parte Pinckard & LaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. White House Lumber Co. v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API