Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Downing-Shofner School

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1936No. 3 Div. 771Published

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Essentially, for the purpose of a proper disposition of this appeal, this was a suit by the appellant against the Downing-Shofner School, whether a corporation, or an unincorporated association, or whether properly named as the Downing-Shofner School, or Downing-Shofner Institute, does not matter. We are persuaded, and hold, that it was identified, sufficiently, as the one and only defendant in the suit. Garnishment was run, under the statutes, in aid of the suit, against the Farmers & Merchants Bank, a corporation.

The garnishee bank duly filed its answer, showing, among other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphree v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Rayford v. FaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & LayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Windham v. City of AndalusiaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API