Legal Opinion

Windham v. City of Andalusia

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1928No. 4 Div. 336PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrigken, P. J.

This cause was submitted on briefs in this court. The bill of exceptions bears the indorsement of an agreement between opposing counsel that it is a correct bill of exceptions. The insistence now made in brief of appellee that the bill of exceptions be stricken as in violation of rule 32 will not be sustained. See, also, Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & Lay, 16 Ala. App. 590, 80 So. 164.

Erom a conviction in the mayor’s court for a violation of a certain ordinance, of the city of Andalusia, the defendant, appellant here, appealed to the circuit court. He was there tried by a jury, demand for which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pellum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & LayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grimes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Brooks v. Downing-Shofner SchoolAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Windham v. City of AndalusiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API