White House Lumber Co. v. Denny

On Motions for Rehearing.

Appellants and appellees have each filed motions for rehearing.

The right of appellants to prove by Mc-Corkle that his debt to appellees had been paid prior to the rendition of their judgment against him is vigorously attacked in a motion by .appellees, evidencing much industry and research. Their contention is based largely upon the following: “34 C. J. 1049, par. 1483, holds as follows: ‘Under exceptions to rule; * * ⅜ Also, it is generally held that, where no fraud or collusion has been shown in the recovery of a judgment, it is conclusive, even as against third…