Legal Opinion
Dow Chemical Co. v. Taylor
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 1, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 38644PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*107MEMORANDUM OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America bring this action seeking declaratory relief as well as preliminary and permanent injunctive relief.
Plaintiffs assert that S. Martin Taylor, Director of the Michigan Employment Security Commission (MESC) and members of that Commission are unlawfully paying unemployment benefits to striking employees of Dow. This is denied.
The employees’ certified bargaining representative, the United Steel Workers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC (USW), and the International Union, United…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Francis v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Davidson v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Eugene R. Lemmon v. Cedar Point, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. State of Hawaii Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976
- Grinnell Corp. v. HackettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Dow Chemical Co. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Grinnell Corporation v. HackettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973