Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
This case brings before us again the complex question whether state financial aid to striking workers, here unemployment compensation benefits, is preempted by the federal labor statutes and policy. We initially wrestled with that preemption question in a ease involving state and federal welfare benefits made available to strikers. ITT v. Minter, 435 F.2d 989 (1st Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 933, 91 S.Ct. 1526, 28 L.Ed.2d 868, reh. den., 404 U.S. 874, 92 S.Ct. 27, 30 L.Ed.2d 120 (1971). See Note, Welfare for Strikers: ITT v. Minter, 39 U.Chi.L.Rev. 79 (1971).1
On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rinsky v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Sharfarz v. Goguen (In Re Goguen)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.