Legal Opinion

Grinnell Corp. v. Hackett

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 15, 1973No. Nos. 72-1275, 72-1276PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

This case brings before us again the complex question whether state financial aid to striking workers, here unemployment compensation benefits, is preempted by the federal labor statutes and policy. We initially wrestled with that preemption question in a ease involving state and federal welfare benefits made available to strikers. ITT v. Minter, 435 F.2d 989 (1st Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 933, 91 S.Ct. 1526, 28 L.Ed.2d 868, reh. den., 404 U.S. 874, 92 S.Ct. 27, 30 L.Ed.2d 120 (1971). See Note, Welfare for Strikers: ITT v. Minter, 39 U.Chi.L.Rev. 79 (1971).1

On…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rinsky v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Sharfarz v. Goguen (In Re Goguen)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API