Legal Opinion

Yasunaga v. Stockburger

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1941No. Civ. 6183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The petitioner has appealed from an order sustaining without leave to amend a demurrer to her application for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Control of the State of California to approve, allow and direct to be paid two specific claims for reimbursement of taxes from a special fund created by the legislature (Stats. 1933, chap. 968, p. 2490), which taxes were erroneously levied and collected under article XIII, section 15, of the Constitution of California, for operating, as common carriers, a trucking business on the public highways of this state. Pursuant to that order, judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Estate of BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Brandt v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Liebman v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Easton v. GellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Leahey v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Chase v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API