Legal Opinion
Estate of Bloom
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13712PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A petition for hearing in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, was granted by this court. After further consideration we are satisfied with the opinion of the District Court of Appeal and hereby adopt the same as and for the opinion of this court, as follows:
“This is an appeal by the State Controller from an order entered in the above matter determining that no inheritance tax was due the state of California, and directing a refund of the inheritance tax previously paid.
“David Bloom died testate in the city and county of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Tilt v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Overby v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. TisdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Thormann v. FrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.