Legal Opinion

Cotton ex rel. McClure v. City of Eureka

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 24, 2012No. Case No. C 08-04386 SBAPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Objections to Magis*1160trate Judge Laurel Beeler’s Report and Recommendation Re: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees (“R & R”), filed July 5, 2012. Dkt. 319. Having read and considered the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the Court hereby OVERRULES Plaintiffs’ objections and ADOPTS the R & R. The Court, in its discretion, finds this…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Trevino v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bellinghausen v. Tractor Supply Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Schuchardt v. Law Office of ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. (PS) J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Estrada AlvarezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Abraham Abittan, et al. v. Hansen Law Firm, P.C., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. BROADMOOR LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO., et al. v. TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API