Legal Opinion
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,617 Creasy Conn, and Continental Insurance Company, Intervening v. Fales Division of Mathewson Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1987No. 19-1226PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Creasy Conn was injured in the course of her employment. She sued the corporation which was a successor to the manufacturer whose equipment caused her injury. We find no indication that Kentucky law would permit her to prevail on her cause of action, and we thus affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment against her.
I
On July 18, 1983, Creasy Conn was injured in the course of her employment with Continental Air Filter, Inc., in Louisville, Kentucky, while attempting to operate an industrial machine known as a Fales machine. On July 17, 1984, Conn filed a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- David Dayton v. Peck, Stow and Wilcox Co. (Pexto)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Cyr v. B. Offen & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pearson Ex Rel. Trent v. National Feeding Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- McCarthy v. Litton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Nissen Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- National Gypsum Co. v. Continental Brands Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.