Richardson v. Gregory
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The complaint in this action states that the defendant, “ for a valuable consideration,” promised to pay plaintiff $5,000 upon the happening of a certain event. The defendant answered, denying all material allegations of the complaint. Then, upon demand, a bill of particulars was served by plaintiff. A motion was made by defendant for judgment on the pleadings and denied, resulting in this appeal.
The motion was made under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and was timely. It challenges the complaint as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and might have been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Dineen v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Portalis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Pease Piano Co. v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Pease Piano Company v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Green v. DonigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Cohen v. ErdleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Culotta v. Banana Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1931
- In re the Probate of the Will of BaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- Rijek Realty, Inc. v. CristAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.