Legal Opinion
Green v. Doniger
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1949PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Upon this appeal our inquiry goes to the legal sufficiency of two of the several causes of action alleged in the complaint.
As the case comes to us on appeal from a judgment on the pleadings, we accept as true not only the material allegations of fact contained in the complaint (Nevins, Inc., v. Kasmach, 279 N. Y. 323, 325), but also those contained in the bill of particulars. (M ay Metropolitan Corp. v. May Oil Burner Corp., 290 N. Y. 260, 266-267; Richardson v. Gregory, 219 App. Div. 211, 212, affd. 245 N. Y. 540; Forsbrey v. Pulp & Paper Trading, Co., 273 App. Div. 770, affd. 297 N. Y. 984.)
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schwartzreich v. . Bauman-Basch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- May Metropolitan Corp. v. May Oil Burner Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Nevins, Inc. v. KasmachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Miller v. VanderlipNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Rodgers v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Morlee Sales Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- In re the Estate of SchanzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Chemical Bank v. WassermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.