In re the Probate of the Will of Baum
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
John D. Bennett, S.
The petitioner moves “ for an order striking from the objections item ‘ 4 ’ and all matters therein alleging undue influence and fraud ’ ’. The notice of motion does not comply with the requirements of section 280 of the Civil Practice Act nor does it state whether the application for relief is sought pursuant to rules 109 or 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. However, whether considered as a motion brought pursuant to either or both of these rules, the motion must be denied. The objection attacked reads as follows: ‘ ‘ That the said paper offered for probate was not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re the Estate of MullinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of HerleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Richardson v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Cohen v. ErdleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- In Re the Probate of the Will of MullinNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Accounting of AllanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- In re the Estate of SchneiderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970