Cohen v. Erdle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The complaint, standing alone, sets forth a good cause of action for services rendered by plaintiff-respondent for and on behalf of the defendants-appellants, at their special instance and request. However, considering the bill of particulars, as Ave must in motions of this character (All Amer. Sureties Co. v. Foundation Co., 211 App. Div. 684; Davison Coal Co. v. National Park Bank, 201 App. Div. 309; Richardson v. Gregory, 219 App. Div. 211; 4 Carmody-Wait Cyclopedia of N. Y. Practice, § 8, p. 622) we find therein allegations which are contrary to the essential allegations of the complaint,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Levy v. LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Richardson v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- A. Sidney Davison Coal Co. v. National Park BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Bankers Trust Co. v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schuler v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Munyan v. Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & MosleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Friedland v. FriedlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Berkule v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Kinner v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.