Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The above cross-actions in Admiralty were instituted as the result of a collision between the S.S. Thomas W. Hyde and the S.S. Esso Charleston in Oran Bay, North Africa, April 30, 1944. In A. 142-211 the Standard Oil Company alleges two causes of action; the first for collision damages and the second for war risk insurance. In A. 146-59 the United States pleads a cause of action for collision damages and the Standard Oil Company claims a set-off, based on war risk insurance, against any recovery of the cross-libelant, the United States. At this time I will not pass…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lind v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Long Island R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. v. The AuraniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1886
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of New Jersey. Standard Oil Co. Of New Jersey v. United States. The Yms-12. The John WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- The Steel InventorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maritrans Operating Partners L.P. v. M/T Faith IDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Maroceano Compania Naviera v. S.S. VerdiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Empressa Hondurena De Vapores v. BANK LINE LTD., ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977