Legal Opinion
Village of Octa v. Octa Retail, Ca2007-04-015 (9-8-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 2008No. CA2007-04-015PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Octa Retail, LLC, appeals an eminent domain decision from the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas. We reverse and remand.
{¶ 2} On April 14, 1997, the village of Octa enacted Ordinance No. 97-003, authorizing the implementation of an urban renewal process. On May 13, 2002, the village enacted an urban renewal plan to relocate and construct a fully improved West Lancaster Road. The plan authorized the village to appropriate any real property via eminent domain to construct the road "to cure blight within the project area."
{¶ 3} Appellant is the owner of six…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Dublin v. FriedmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HollowayOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Columbia Gas v. Phelps Preferred Invests., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Ohio Power Co. v. BurnsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Dublin v. RiverPark Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.