Legal Opinion

City of Dublin v. Friedman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2017No. 16AP-516PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, CHKRS, LLC, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, granting the motion of defendant-appellee, Karen Michelle R. Friedman, to withdraw funds deposited by plaintiff-appellee, city of Dublin, and holding that Dublin properly exercised its quick-take condemnation authority. Because (1) CHKRS did not procure on the purchase option pursuant to the lease, (2) CHKRS's challenge to Dublin's exercise of its quick-take authority is moot, and (3) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying CHKRS's motion for leave to amend its answer,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tschantz v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. GoodenowOhio Supreme Court · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. CHKRS, LLC v. City of Dublin, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Haueisen v. WorthingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Board of Education of the Springfield City School District v. HBH Technology IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  4. CHKRS, LLC v. City of DublinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. CHKRS, LLC v. City of DublinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API