Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. 84-1660PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Per curiam

In order to determine whether the appellant’s death sentence should be affirmed, this court is required to do three things. First, we must answer the specific issues raised by the appellant regarding the proceedings below. Second, we must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances in this case against any factors which mitigate against the imposition of the death penalty. Finally, we must independently consider whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty in similar cases.

Appellant alleges that the trial court wrongfully excluded four prospective jurors on the basis…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court · 1988

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API