Legal Opinion
City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. Reakirt
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 19, 1930No. Nos. 372-374PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
These three cases were heard together. The suits were brought by owners of land in the City of Cincinnati to restrain the appropriation of .their property by the City, upon the grounds that the taking was not in accordance with the applicable provisions of the constitution and statutes of Ohio and would constitute a deprivation of property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, it being alleged that the appropriation was not for a public use. Under the law of Ohio these questions could be raised only by injunction proceedings. P. C. C. & St. L. Railway Co. v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Armendariz v. PenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.