Legal Opinion
Callisch v. Farnham
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1948No. Civ. 7400PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
The present controversy arises out of a written option agreement for the sale of certain real property by plaintiff to defendant. The pertinent portions of the agreement provide as follows:
"Witnesseth : That for and in consideration of the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) to him in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the party of the first part hereby agrees to hold until the 18th day of January, A.D. 1946 (time being of the essence of this option) subject exclusively to the order of the party of the second part the following described real property to-wit:
(Describ…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanson v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Seeburg v. El Royale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bourdieu v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Flickinger v. HeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ivancovich v. MeierArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Covey v. Covey's Little America, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- State of California v. AgostiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.