Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vick v. Brown

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

On June 14, 1946, the interpleaded defendant Breitzman and one Peter Alsmo Vick were each employed by the Stoughton Canning Company. Each reported for work at the plant of the company that morning. The foreman of the company instructed Breitzman to take his car and drive to a farm, known as the Schumacher farm in Rock county, to plant corn for the company. He was instructed to take Vick along to help with the corn planting. Breitzman owned a 1937 Ford automobile which he occasionally used in work for the company. He received no compensation for the use of the car, except that the company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. BergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. TollefsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Narloch v. ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brandt v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Guse v. A. O. Smith Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sandstrom v. Estate of ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Beck v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Ohio Farmers Indem. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1957
  5. County of La Crosse v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API