Legal Opinion

Narloch v. Church

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Defendants contend that in view of the status of employee and employer, which existed between the plaintiff and the defendant Church as employees, and the state as their employer, there is no liability on the part of the insurer under the provisions in its policy (1) in relation to extending the indemnity afforded thereby to others than the named insured; and (2) in relation to the limitations upon and applicable to the coverage which is afforded by the policy for damages sustained as the result of bodily injury or death of an employee caused by the negligence of either his employer or a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apfelbacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bernard v. Wisconsin Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Madison v. StellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Brandt v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Sandstrom v. Estate of ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Frye v. TheigeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Irvin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1957
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API