Legal Opinion

Sandstrom v. Estate of Clausen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1951PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Sec. 204.30 (3), Stats., has remained unchanged since 1943. Numerous cases have come before us requiring its interpretation and have resulted in decisions which it now seems impossible to reconcile. In such a situation we consider it advisable to re-examine the statute with as little bias as possible because of what we have said on other occasions. So viewed, and in the light of our experience with many cases which have presented various aspects of the problems which the statute is designed to treat, we conclude that by the purchase and sale of a policy such as the one described in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Narloch v. ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Vick v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Brandt v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Greaves v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. American General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cimarron Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API