Legal Opinion

Muskin v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 25, 2011No. 140, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

Petitioner, Charles Muskin, trustee of two trusts owning ground rent leases in Baltimore City, contends that Chapter 290 of the Laws of 2007, the Ground Rent Registry Statute, is invalid under the federal and Maryland constitutions and Maryland’s Declaration of Rights. Chapter 290 was enacted by the General Assembly in response to media attention and public interest in perceived problems with the ground rent system in Maryland. The statute requires Respondent, the State Department of Assessments and Taxation (“SDAT”), to maintain an online registry of ground rent leases and, if a ground lease…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. SCR Joint Venture L.P. v. WarshawskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Barclay v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. State v. RoshchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Md. Shall Issue v. HoganDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API