Legal Opinion
D'AOUST v. Diamond
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 31, 2012No. 5, September Term, 2011PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
This case stems from the judicial sale of a condominium owned by Michelle D’Aoust (Petitioner) conducted by court-appointed trustees Cindy R. Diamond and Bruce D. Brown, who were employed by the law firm of Rosen Hoover, P.A. (collectively Respondents) at the time of the sale and surrounding events in connection with the sale. Following the sale of the condominium, Petitioner filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Harford County alleging breach of fiduciary duty involving actual fraud and breach of fiduciary duty involving constructive fraud by Diamond and Brown in connection with the…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Cooper v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Koste v. Town of OxfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Litz v. Maryland Department of the EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Barclay v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Andrews & Lawrence v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.