Legal Opinion

McLeod, Sheriff v. Shaver

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 17, 1939No. 4-5449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This case was a suit brought by the appellee to enjoin Dan McLeod, Sheriff and Collector of Clay county, from collecting’ a peddler’s license from John B. Shaver, who was operating what is known or called a rolling-store in that county. It is the contention of the appellee that the act authorizing the collection of peddler’s license for each county against peddlers' engaged in the same business as appellee was repealed by Act 63 of the Acts of 1929 and that the first fifty-one sections of Act 63 were expressly repealed by Act 119 of 1929; that no part of the law fixing peddlers’ licenses had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little Rock Traction & Electric Co. v. KimbroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. State Ex Rel. Trimble v. KantasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Dickson v. Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Gill and Hamrick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. City of Little Rock v. Arkansas Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Diffee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API