Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Trimble v. Kantas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 27, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Appellants ’ statement of this case may be adopted by us as being concise and yet sufficiently full to show the issues involved.
“This appeal involves the validity of- Special Acts of the General Assembly prohibiting the sale of- intoxicating liquors within three miles of the University of Arkansas, as provided in Special Acts of 1875 (page 206), 1905 (page 692), and 1907 (page 649). In other words, are those acts repealed by acts Nos. 69, 108, and 109 of 1935?
“It was the contention of the plaintiffs that the acts of 1875, 1905, and 1907 have not been repealed or amended, notwithstanding acts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coats v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Louisiana Oil Refining Company v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Hazelrigg v. Board of Penitentiary CommissionersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Massey v. State Use Prairie County.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McLeod, Sheriff v. ShaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Digiacomo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Howard, County Treas. v. Stafford, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Kelleher v. Burlingame, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003