Legal Opinion

Gill and Hamrick v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1938No. CR 4081PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDonham, J.

The appellants, A. E. Gill and Lee Hamrick]’%ere arrested for hawking and peddling in St. Francis county without a license as required by Pope’s Digest’, § 13574. The appellant, A. E. Gill, owned two trucks which were operated by his employees over the state and county highways of St. Francis county, engaged in the selling of; merchandise ’ to customers who "might come out on-the highway and flag them to a stop. These trucks were built like stores, containing shelving, sales windows and counters. These trucks were driven from place to place and from house to house along the highways. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. SaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Berry v. Cousart Bayou Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. El Dorado Baking Co. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. McCarroll, Commissioner of Revenues v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McLeod, Sheriff v. ShaverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API