City of Little Rock v. Arkansas Corp. Commission
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The question presented, say appellants, “is to determine whether in passing Act 129 of 1941 the Legislature elected to employ an income tax on national hank stock dividends as a substitute for the ad valorem tax on national bank shares. In other words, did Act 129 relieve national banks of the payment of an act valorem tax on their shares'?”
It is conceded that a state may tax the shares of stock in national banks located within its limits" only as Congress may direct.
Title 12, § 548, U. S. C. A., provides: “The Legislature of each state may determine,and direct, subject to the provisions of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- McCain, Comm. of Labor v. Crossett Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Wiseman v. Arkansas Utilities CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Hardin v. Fort Smith Couch & Bedding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Refunding Board of Arkansas v. BaileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Mourot v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing OpticiansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Bishop v. LINKWAY STORES, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Cook v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- McMillan v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.