Legal Opinion
L.A. Development v. City of Sherwood
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 17, 1999No. C960475CV; CA A100395PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of its complaint for damages resulting from the trial court’s grant of defendants’ summary judgment motion. ORCP 47. We affirm because plaintiff is estopped from claiming damages as a matter of law.
Plaintiff developed two land projects in the City of Sherwood. The initial subdivision received approval from the planning commission in two phases: Kathy Park I in November 1991 and Kathy Park II in November 1992. The final “planned unit development,” William Park, received preliminary approval through the adoption of an ordinance by the city council in April…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Suess Builders Co. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Murray v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003