Legal Opinion

Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 24, 2003No. 011423; A117769PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this inverse condemnation action, plaintiff Coast Range Conifers, LLC (CRC), contends that the state has taken its property without compensation by refusing to permit CRC to log timberland identified as a nesting site for bald eagles. CRC’s complaint alleges regulatory takings claims based on both the state and the federal constitutions. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court denied CRC’s motion, granted the state’s motion, and entered judgment dismissing CRC’s claims. On appeal, CRC argues that the trial court should have granted its motion and denied the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marsha Seiber and Alvin Seiber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Archambault v. OgierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. McMillan v. FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API