Legal Opinion

Ferar v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1951No. Docket 64, Calendar 44,896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiff invested $1,800 in the common stock of the corporate defendant and brought this suit to recover his investment on the grounds that he had been defrauded, that his investment had been induced by false reports, and that the stock had been sold to him in violation of the blue sky law. * The defendants are the corporation, Cortez R. Hall, its president and principal stockholder, Grace M. Brown, secretary, and Guerrier and Stimson, 2 directors. The case was tried before a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, and again at the conclusion of all the proofs, defendants moved for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cleland v. SmartMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Noll v. WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Getter v. R. G. Dickinson & Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1973
  2. Pransky v. Falcon Group, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Connellan v. HimelhochDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  4. Cola v. TerzanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API