Legal Opinion

Cleland v. Smart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1948No. Docket No. 5, Calendar No. 43,776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

This is an action in assumpsit brought under the provisions of the statute commonly designated as the blue-sky law, 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9769 et seq., as amended by Act No. 165, Pub. Acts 1941 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, 1943, § 9769 et seq., Stat. Ann. and Stat. Ann. 1944 Cum. Supp. § 19.741 et seq.). *

Plaintiff sued for recovery of moneys paid for purchase of stock which was not authorized by law to be sold. After the case was at issue, plaintiff moved for summary judgment against both defendants. Defendant Smart filed an affidavit of merits. Plaintiff had judgment for $1,500 and costs against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chambers v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cola v. TerzanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Ferar v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Van Houtum v. Associated Broadcasting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API