Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Matter of Konopka

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 4, 1991Published

1ConcurrenceStein, J.

The Court heard argument on this attorney-disciplinary proceeding in October 1989, following the Disciplinary Review Board’s (DRB) recommendation that respondent be disbarred for knowingly misappropriating clients’ trust funds, as required by this Court’s decision in In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979). Before us, the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) argued that disbarment was the only appropriate discipline in view of respondent’s knowing misappropriation of clients’ funds.

Based on its own careful and comprehensive review of the proceedings before the District Ethics Committee…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re StoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of WarhaftigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API