Legal Opinion

Matter of Fleischer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 28, 1986PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

These disciplinary proceedings involve three respondents, who constitute all the members of their former law firm. They are charged with various ethical infractions, most notably the misappropriation of clients’ funds. Although one member of the firm, respondent Fleischer, was primarily responsible for *442the firm’s disbursements, all three respondents knew of and participated in the misappropriation.

After a hearing, the District IX Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee) returned a presentment, finding, among other things, that respondents had knowingly used clients’ funds for their own benefit.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Matter of HennessySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Matter of FucetolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. In re MarksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Matter of SkevinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Matter of KonopkaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Matter of WarhaftigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Matter of JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Matter of OrlandoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API