Monica v. Pelicas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The judgment declares that plaintiff is and ever since February 27, 1948, has been the equitable owner of an undivided fractional interest in a house and lot which defendants Manuel and Arminda Pelicas as joint tenants acquired on that date.
Defendant-appellant Arminda Pelicas claims the evidence does not support the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the judgment is based.
The principal findings are these: Plaintiff can neither read nor write. He speaks English only slightly and with considerable difficulty. He and Arminda opened a savings account in joint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Burns v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Foster v. KeatingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Day v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Quezada v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Yarus v. YarusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.