Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Harding
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
Nissan appeals from a district court judgment abstaining from the exercise of jurisdiction based on Texas Railroad Commission v. Pullman, 312 U.S. 496, 61 S.Ct. 643, 85 L.Ed. 971 (1941). Because we find an unsettled issue of state law presented in this case, we affirm the district court’s decision to abstain.
I
In 1979, Nissan Motor Corporation (“Nissan”) and Twin City Datsun, Inc. (“Twin City”) entered into an agreement that established Twin City as a dealer of Datsun automobiles and products in Texas City, Texas. The contract provided that Twin City could not relocate its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisiana Debating and Literary Ass'n v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- MISSISSIPPI SURPLUS LINES ASS'N v. MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005
- Bin Lep v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Bolline v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1991
- Elta Fanning v. City of Shavano Park, Texas.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.