Legal Opinion

Bolline v. City of New Orleans

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 20, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-5015, 91-525Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FELDMAN, District Judge.

Notwithstanding the assertion of grave federal constitutional issues in these consolidated cases, this Court must presently abstain from speaking to those issues because substantial state constitutional law issues are at the center of this controversy and resolution of the state law issues by the Louisiana state courts could moot or substantially alter the federal issues before this Court. The assertion of the federal power should await the effort of the state courts to resolve the state issues which drive and might resolve this dispute.

I

A

The history…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Harman v. ForsseniusSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Kusper v. PontikesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reetz v. BozanichSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API