Legal Opinion

Capuchino Land Co. v. Board of Trustees

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1917No. Civ. No. 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment in petitioner’s favor upon a hearing of its application for a writ of review, wherein the petitioner sought to have reviewed and annulled the action of the hoard of trustees of the city of San Bruno in calling and holding an election for the proposed annexation of certain territory to and its inclusion within the corporate boundaries of said municipality.

The election was called and held under the provisions of the act of 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 358), providing a method for the inclusion of outside inhabited territory within the corporate limits of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. Van Nuys Lighting DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People Ex Rel. Pennington v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. All Parties and PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API