Kriese v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Chief Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the Commission’s hearing officer committed error in finding that the petitioning widow was not entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits because her deceased husband’s death did not result from an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment.
Petitioner filed a claim seeking benefits for the death of her husband, who was killed in an automobile accident on the night of June 7, 1974, in Phoenix, Arizona. When her claim was denied by the respondent insurance carrier, she filed a timely request for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Strauss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fisher Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Greenlaw Jewelers v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Campbell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990