Greenlaw Jewelers v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an award of the Industrial Commission finding that an employee’s injuries did arise out of and in the course of employment. The petitioners, employer and carrier, contend that the award is not supported by the evidence. We disagree and affirm the decision of the Industrial Commission.
The facts necessary for a determination on this matter are as follows. Nathan Morris was President of Allied Jewelers, Inc. Allied had various inter-relationships with enterprises in which Morris was involved, including the defendant employer, Green-law Jewelers.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Sherrill & La Follette v. HerringArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Fisher Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James H. Hartzell, Beryl Hartzell, and Ross Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Pima Community College v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Connors v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Ziv v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.