Mitchem v. National Weaving Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The following excerpt, taken from the charge, forms the basis of one of defendant’s exceptive assignments of error:
“Now, under this issue, if you shall find that it was done without probable cause, the law implies that it was done with implied malice — a wrongful act done without legal justification.”
This instruction is not supported by the decisions on the subject.
It is true that malice, in the sense the term is used in actions for malicious prosecution, may be inferred from want of probable cause, but it is not presumed from such fact alone. Johnson v. Chambers, 32 N. C., 287.
Speaking to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Wilkinson v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Williams v. Kuppenheimer Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Taylor v. . HodgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Gulf States Paper Corp. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Perry v. . HurdleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.