Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1925PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vaesee, J".

Tbe plaintiff, tbe salesman of tbe defendants’ "Wilmington Sboe Store, was employed first by Murpby, wbo was called botb auditor and manager, wbo travels around and gets each store into operating condition and installs tbe employees and then, evidently, performs tbe duties of auditor afterwards. Tbe defendant,' Eedford, was employed by.Murphy and given tbe title of “general manager” of tbe Wilmington store. Eedford was in charge of tbe Wilmington store and employed tbe help, after tbe business was started off by Murpby. When tbe plaintiff became dissatisfied and quit, be was hired…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Denver & Rio Grande Railway v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Sawyer v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Roll v. TimbermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API